Tagged: team RSS

  • Gremlin 12:28 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , effective, functioning, , , team, ,   

    Do you think the team can win a big game of the Super Bowl, but without effective functioning of the game? 

    It goes at least 950 and 15tds. It also has 40 passes for 500 yards and 3 TDS. Super Bowl could win with this kind of back? Do you still need a back xeb & q #; can give you 1500 yards and 20 TDS, also received at least 300 meters?

     
    • Teebucky 3:59 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Dude, the Cardinals were minutes away from winning a Super Bowl w/ the worst rushing attack in the league! So it can be done.

    • Hawk M 3:46 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Like “somathus” said
      neither team in the SB had a 1,000 yard runner
      (tho it does help)

      you need to survive the season, and get hot in the postseason

    • dluv1126 2:57 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Yes.

      Look at the San Francisco 49ers of the eighties and the St. Louis Rams of the late nineties.

    • r. clanton(packerfan) 2:04 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      yea you can if your qb is one of the best and your d can get a pick six just about ever time the ball is tossed…..

    • Alex W 1:35 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      you could easily win with option one unfortunately you can just look back to 2007 with the Giants

    • somathus 1:21 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Pittsburgh just did it. They didn’t have a rusher with more than 800 yards or 5 TDs. The key to a championship is staying healthy and playing your best football in the playoffs.

  • Gremlin 10:34 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , selected, , team   

    What happens to an NFL team is selected to host the Super Bowl makes it to the Super Bowl? 

    Next year the super bowl will be played at cowboy stadium in arlignton texas. If the dallas cowboys make it to the super bowl next year, would the NFL move the game, or would the cowboys get to play the super bowl at home?

    View full post on Adored Celebrity

     
    • Gen. Stiggo (Atheati-in-Chief) 3:44 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The game would go on as scheduled. It would be impossible to change the venue between the Conference Championship game and the Super Bowl.

      In addition, the game site is awarded to the city, not the team.

    • Matt21 3:40 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      i dont think this ever happened but i would guess that they would cuz they wouldnt want to give a team a significant advantage…theyd probbably use that stadium the next year that the team doesnt make it

    • Paul in San Diego 2:47 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      They get to play at their home stadium and get a distinct home field advantage. The Super Bowl takes a whole year to plan and they wouldn’t even consider moving it unless it was simply impossible to play a game somewhere. Like if there were some kind of natural disaster that devastated a stadium or the local infrastructure.

    • iRome 1:53 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Same place lol

    • Nicci R 1:49 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      first I’d like to state that the Dallas Cowboys haven’t made it to the post season in forever. second, the superbowl is set over a year ahead of time and so thus would be impossible to change in a weeks notice.

    • John 1:07 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I guess the Cowboys would have home field advantage. And be the first team to play in their own stadium in the Super Bowl

    • Barroccoli 12:25 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      It’s never happened. But if it did, like in the scenario you are talking about, then the Cowboys would still play at home.

    • Will 12:09 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Nothing would change. This has actually happened twice before, just not at the actual home stadium: the Rams at XIV (played at the Rose Bowl), and the Niners at XIX (played at Stanford Stadium). At the first game, the Rams were allocated their team’s share of the tickets *plus* the home team’s share, and the Steelers complained that amounted to favoritism. So the Niners did not receive the customary 10% of the tickets for the home team.

    • Sharingan of accuracy. 11:25 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      NFL teams don’t host Super Bowls. Cities host the Super Bowl. If the Cowboys make it, the game is played at Cowboys Stadium.

    • Adam 10:35 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      nothing changes

  • Gremlin 9:28 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Bandwagoners, , join, , team   

    Bandwagoners how to join the team that won the Super Bowl? 

    How many people have been working with wood, while the team win Super Bowl tifozëte? I say that at least two hundred thousand. These are silly people. The life of your person, not judges and others who want to play Rig.

     
    • THE PANTHERS FAN 4:11 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      A lot for sure.

    • COLTS LOST 3:39 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Every girl ever in this section, ive never heard of one of them being a fan of a losing team. And 50% of the people on here right now.

    • RWB4646 3:08 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      There are thousands of them jumping off the Vikings bandwagon right now and I suppose they will be looking for a new wagon to ride .

    • Yes Yes 2:19 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      if the eagles win, people might hate them more than already, if thats possible.
      and the cowboys could go 0-16, and youd have those mindless cowboy fans still talkin smack.

    • Horse Butt 1:48 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I will

    • Raymon S. 1:26 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      id say 1/10 of the country’s sports fans will. it happens every year and each year it annoys me more.

    • the guy 12:33 am on February 7, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      a team rarely wins a bowl 2 times in a row so no

    • green_lantern66 11:56 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Enough to break the bandwagons of the previous three Super Bowl champions…

    • Jaws67 11:08 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      All of them.

    • # 43 Cristian 10:23 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      ok wat

  • Gremlin 2:28 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , chance, , franchise, history, , team, , winning   

    Which team has a better chance of winning their first Super Bowl in their franchise history? 

    Minnesota Vikings or the New Orleans Saints? I am not clear out Colts or Jets, because they have already won the Super Bowl already Eventhough are not airplanes and # xeb; won a SB since 1968, when they had Joe Namath. Anyway, Saints and Vikings play the NFC Championship, if the Saints win, they will be their first Super Bowl. If the Vikings win, it will be their 4th Super Bowl appearance. They were Vikings in Super Bowl 3 times in 1970, but they have lost all general & ata.Në # xeb; as Vikings or Saints?

     
    • George T 8:01 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      saints 24 – jets 17…this answer your question?

    • Steve915 7:02 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Not only are the Vikings 0-4 in the Super Bowl, they have NEVER even had a lead in any of the games they were in.

      I’m going with the Saints this year.

    • conley39 6:08 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I think the Saints have a slight advantage since they’ve got the homefield advantage for the NFC championship. They are both good teams, but both also have some issues. I really don’t know what to expect from this game right now. It should be a great game.

    • d0rkzer0 5:46 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The Vikings. Saints are overrated. Played only 2 teams in the normal season with a winning record and lost to one of them. Their big plays are because they are against teams with corners and safeties 40 yards out of position. The Saints had the easiest schedule in the NFL this year. Unfortunately either team would lose to the Colts.

    • Jeff N 5:40 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Actually, the Vikings are 0-4 in Super Bowls. The Buffalo Bills are also 0-4, however, they went 4 times in a row and lost. I think that both the Vikings and the Saints have an equal chance to reach the SB and either will beat the AFC team that makes it.

    • Mike W 4:42 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      There are a few firsts that can be achieved this year in the playoffs. The Jets have never won an AFC title, they went to the Super Bowl as the AFL Champion. The Vikings have never won a Super Bowl, they played in Super Bowl IV, VIII, IX, and XI, and lost to the Chiefs, Dolphins, Steelers, and Raiders. The Saints have never played in a Super Bowl, which means that the never won one. The Jets won their Super Bowl against the Colts, now they’re playing against the Colts for the chance to go to the Super Bowl. I think that the Super Bowl will be Saints vs Colts.

    • introvertedguy06 4:21 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I’d have to go with the Saints

    • just joe 3:56 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The Saints. A complete football team. The Vikings have some holes, but still a great team. Either way, the NFC is going to win the Super Bowl.

    • Justin H 2:59 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I haven’t watched enough football this year to know how the two teams match up, but I wouldn’t bet against Farve, especially playing in a dome.

  • Gremlin 12:28 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , location, playing, , team   

    What happens if the location of the Super Bowl is like a team playing? 

    NFL Super Bowl Picks place there about 3 years since the bowl, Super too bad if the home team & # xeb, was he? A situation will change and if so, how will they choose instead to medium term?

     
    • Michael M 5:13 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      It actually did happen when the SF 49ers faced off against the Miami Dolphins in 1990 for the 1989 Super Bowl. It was supposed to take place in Candlestick Park, home of the 49ers, but that stadium was under repair due to the 1989 SF earthquake disaster. Instead, Stanford Stadium, about 25 miles from SF, but still considered within “49er” territory was the venue.

      If it happens, it happens! Home field advantage may or may not be in play because maybe 1/3 of the home team’s season ticket holding fans will be able to purchase tickets and the rest will be media, opposing fans, fans from out of town, VIP’s and corporate factions.

    • hawks_4_life 5:12 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      They would not change the location, but it has never happened and I doubt it every will. The NFL always tries to choose the stadium of a team that did not do good the previous season.

    • Jakki S 4:17 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      No they would not change it ….. that team would have home field advantage

    • Kolby K 3:59 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Nothing, they still play there. In fact, this happened in the CFL this year were Montreal made it to the Grey Cup and that’s were it was already selected they play at. They lost to lol.

    • Eric M 3:12 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      They wouldn’t change the location…

      You’d learn that the team who would get homefield advantage in the Super Bowl, gets it two weeks prior to the date of the actual game. By that time, tickets are already sold out, and they set up for the game in that stadium a good period of time before the actual game kicks off.

      If the team who reaches the Super Bowl has homefield, then you’d better believe they earned it. In the end, “they have home field advantage” is not a valid excuse. Great teams rise above it.

    • Gen. Stiggo [Atheati-in-Chief] 2:59 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      They would not change the location. As yet, this has not happened, although the Niners played one Super Bowl in nearby Palo Alto. But there is nothing short of a natural disaster or a nuclear missile strike that could get the NFL to change the location of the Super Bowl.

    • steelernation 2:56 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      the team lucks out and gets a home game.

    • New Super Luigi (Over it) 2:52 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      No. That team would just have home field advantage. That would be pretty short notice to just move a major event of that caliber to some other unprepared city.

    • Scuba Steve 2:46 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      They would have to play there anyway, but so far it has never happened.

    • Ken Mek 2:45 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Hey i believed its a little thing i like to call HOME FIELD ADVANTAGE!!!!!!!

    • Derek (Steelers, SB champs) 1:49 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Well, then they just play the game I would guess.

    • You Are Dry Shaving Me 1:06 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      They have an advantage.

  • Gremlin 2:28 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , dose, , , team, ,   

    What team dose of Super Bowl tickets will be for their family? 

    I was wondering how many players buy into the bowl to get their bunk family? Or a question of how much they are willing to pay?

     
    • Ryan 3:15 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Each player gets ten tickets and has the option of negotiating for more

  • Gremlin 10:28 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , chosen, , , , , team   

    What happens to an NFL team is chosen to host the Super Bowl makes t & # xeb; Super Bowl? 

    Super Bowl next year will be played arlignton Texas Cowboy Stadium. If the Cowboys make the Super Bowl next year, moving; NFL game, or have to play Cowboys Super Bowl at home?

     
    • Adam 3:18 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      nothing changes

    • Sharingan of accuracy. 2:54 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      NFL teams don’t host Super Bowls. Cities host the Super Bowl. If the Cowboys make it, the game is played at Cowboys Stadium.

    • Will 2:14 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Nothing would change. This has actually happened twice before, just not at the actual home stadium: the Rams at XIV (played at the Rose Bowl), and the Niners at XIX (played at Stanford Stadium). At the first game, the Rams were allocated their team’s share of the tickets *plus* the home team’s share, and the Steelers complained that amounted to favoritism. So the Niners did not receive the customary 10% of the tickets for the home team.

    • Barroccoli 1:15 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      It’s never happened. But if it did, like in the scenario you are talking about, then the Cowboys would still play at home.

    • John 12:50 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I guess the Cowboys would have home field advantage. And be the first team to play in their own stadium in the Super Bowl

    • Nicci R 12:43 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      first I’d like to state that the Dallas Cowboys haven’t made it to the post season in forever. second, the superbowl is set over a year ahead of time and so thus would be impossible to change in a weeks notice.

      • TJ Davis 6:55 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        You must not watch football. The Cowboys made it to the post season this year and won their playoff game. They were two games away from the Super Bowl. They were also in the post season the year before last.

        • Gremlin 7:35 pm on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

          Thx for that update TJ.

    • iRome 12:09 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Same place lol

    • Paul in San Diego 12:01 am on February 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      They get to play at their home stadium and get a distinct home field advantage. The Super Bowl takes a whole year to plan and they wouldn’t even consider moving it unless it was simply impossible to play a game somewhere. Like if there were some kind of natural disaster that devastated a stadium or the local infrastructure.

    • Matt21 11:31 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      i dont think this ever happened but i would guess that they would cuz they wouldnt want to give a team a significant advantage…theyd probbably use that stadium the next year that the team doesnt make it

    • Gen. Stiggo (Atheati-in-Chief) 11:10 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The game would go on as scheduled. It would be impossible to change the venue between the Conference Championship game and the Super Bowl.

      In addition, the game site is awarded to the city, not the team.

  • Gremlin 6:28 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , candidate, ence, favorite, Prefs, President, , team, victory   

    Which is better: a Super Bowl victory for your favorite team or your candidate is to become President & Prefs # xe9; ence? 

    For example, say you’re a hardcore Giants fan and you really want to vote for Barack Obama too. If you could choose one First you get Super Bowl-winning Giants or Obama becomes president the United States?

     
    • kanya_mukesh 10:41 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Barack Obama

    • sgoldperson 9:59 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Depends on the Candidate, but usually would prefer my team to win. Face it a President can only do what Congress will agree to. The President can’t get a Bill started in Congress, it requires a Congressman to start it. Then Congress has to get it moving and get a majority to support it. Only then does the President get to sign off on it. Some Presidents will be charming or have a strong enough personality to get the bills started and through Congress on their own. Usually though they need to work with Congress. Having the candidate you want to have win is great though.

    • Elizabeth 9:55 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      This is horrible to say but the way I feel right now is just GREAT and seeing someone become the President wont have the same effect on me.

      Sure, I have a favorite in the Presidential race but if they win or lose, it wont really effect me too much.

    • holly 9:22 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      President..super bowl winners don’t make a difference to your daily life, but your president will make a difference for 4-8 years!

    • D1Balla 9:06 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      it wouldn’t matter if obama won, b/c i’d be watching the super bowl from canada. obama is an idiot.

    • RCrumb 9:01 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Oh gee, like if a sports team wins it means anything at all to anyone, while in Politics it means everything.

    • quaypon 8:01 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I’d say go Giants!! Don’t think it matters too much who the Prez is. You can see where my priorities are right?

    • Wounded Duck 7:39 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The President affects REAL life a lot more than ANY football game. Perspective my friend!!

    • MUTA = Excellence (Mr. C) 7:13 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I would give any worldly possession I have just to see the New Orleans Saints hoist the Lombardi Trophy once.

    • Chelsea ツ 7:13 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Superbowl.. politics bore me. Besides any chump that gets president will be better than the one we have now!

  • Gremlin 2:28 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , determine, home, , team,   

    How can they determine which team is home team in the Super Bowl? 

    I thought NFL alternated between NFC and AFC as a team he was “Home team in the Super Bowl each year. But after watching some of the previous Super Bowls, this is not the case. NFC ate home-UNI for the last 3 Super Bowls.

     
    • cmac 7:27 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      actually the underdog is always considered the home team which will be whoever plays the patriots

    • Chase O 6:35 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      better record or coin toss

    • Ashley H 5:41 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      They dont . See this year the super bowl is in phionix. Nether patriots, giants, or packers are from phionix. i think they just pick a random city.lol

    • Tom Brady for Prez {219} 4:55 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      They dont. Every year they play it somewhere else which is not any of the two teams home.

    • Answerer 4:17 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I would guess they would use the same tie-breaking procedures they do in the playoffs – best record is home, if their records are tied it uses the playoff tiebreaker. I don’t know for sure though, I’m curious myself.

    • negaduck 3:45 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      since the game is in a neutral location what difference does it make? who gets to call the coin toss? is that it?

    • playboyperry509 3:00 pm on February 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      better record.

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel

Powered by Yahoo! Answers